The easy version of this contention is that the Las Vegas Raiders have cap space, Eric Stokes played better than expected and general managerJohn Spytek should just write the check. That is clean. It is also incomplete and doesn’t exactly give you the whole story. Well, that’s what we’re here for.
Should Raiders GM John Spytek prioritize Eric Stokes?
Stokes was a useful find on a one-year prove-it deal, and that matters. Las Vegas needed competence at the corner slot, and he gave them real snaps. But a rebound season does not automatically make him a priority signing at any price, especially for a roster Spytek has already described accurately: 3-14, inconsistent and still short on talent across multiple spots. Cap space is not a reason to spend. It is a tool, and Spytek’s job is to decide where that tool creates the most long-term value.
This is where the Sports Illustrated report goes a little too far. Yes, Stokes was one of the Raiders’ better pending free agents, and yes, they have cap space. But that does not mean he has to be back. John Spytek is not trying to keep last year’s roster together. He is trying to build a better one. If Stokes’ price jumps, the real question is not whether he played well in 2025. It is whether he is the best use of that money compared with other corners, other needs and the draft.
Related: The game-changing coaching hire for Raiders RB Ashton Jeanty
Spytek’s own previous comments support a more disciplined approach. He did not describe a team that was one or two veteran signings away. He described a team that failed to perform consistently and has a lot of work to do. That should push the Raiders toward smart value shopping, not sentimental retention.
Re-signing Stokes can make sense, but only if the contract reflects what he is: a player who helped stabilize a weak room, not a player who removes the need to keep investing in it.
The cornerback problem is bigger than one name. Las Vegas likely needs multiple additions, plus competition, plus depth that can survive injuries. If Stokes returns on a reasonable deal, fine. If his price rises beyond the Raiders’ valuation, Spytek should be willing to walk and reallocate resources. That is not negligence. That is roster construction.
The report is right about one thing: letting Stokes leave would add to the offseason to-do list. The part it misses is that Spytek’s list is already long, and paying a premium to make one line item feel better does not mean the roster actually gets better.
*Top Photo: Ramble Illustration/Getty Images